Complex isn't it ?

Everything that begins has an end to it.. this is something we have grown up knowing, seeing and learning from what is around us, but when i start to think of it my mind sometimes stops being reasonable and brings me to a kind of junction between spirituality and science i would like to call it SPIRIENCE (SPIRItuality+sciENCE ). There is a notable reason for me to put spirituality before science in the new term i coined. This reminds me to quote Swami Vivekananda,
                                 "Religion deals with the truths of the metaphysical world, just as chemistry and the other natural sciences deal with the truth of the physical world. The book one must read to learn chemistry is the book of (external) nature. The book from which to learn religion is your own mind and heart. The sage is often ignorant of physical science, because he reads the wrong book - the book within and the scientist is too often is ignorant of religion, because he, too, reads the wrong book - the book without".
                                           Such an intelligent choice of words. This sometimes leads me to wonder is there really a science? i question science because the so called scientists (who study science) renounce spirituality, whereas spirituality always co existed with science. My feeble mind can only think of science as the laws of nature created by the supreme to keep us bound in some limits so that we can not create havoc in the most beautiful of his creations. Something similar to what happens to Neo in the Matrix, he was bound by laws which actually never existed but when he realizes himself he could do whatever he wanted. Matrix itself was a fancy rip-off of the holy Geeta (compilation of words spoken by Lord Krishna in the battlefield).The point is of self realization. Is it so that once you have realization you will know the begining of it all. The begining of time-the begining of god. What would it lead to?.. heaven or is it just a human imagination.
                                        There are many studies trying to find a relation indirectly like a study that was carried out on more than 20,000 people and it was acertained that lonely, sad, socially less active and less loved people had comparatively shorter lifespan. Here comes my question isn't it that medical science tells us that logevity of life depends on genes, DNA and on cellular level, so how come these things in the study mentioned above ..reached the genes. To support my opinion i have one more question.
                                        How do such human experiences as job satisfaction, happiness, and meditation get into the cells? There is a physiology of loving and caring, ranging from embarrassing facial blush to palpitations, sweating and stammering. Feelings of love generate physical events.It may seem a distant transition from being in love in one's teens to being a confidant or a supportive spouse later in life, but physiologic changes are involved on both ends of the spectrum. These changes are not trivial. They can make the difference between life and death. There are instances of people who really fought for their life and came out alive out of seemingly impossible situations which may look like a miracle, then there are others who were saved by someone and they admitted they did not even fight to be alive.
                                         What is it that encourages one man to fight against all odds and the other to just give up? Why so many times the thoughts of families boost one's morale to fight. Muscles also reach a fatigue level then what is it that keeps them going? Is it just BRAIN or there is a SOUL / MIND too, carrying our weights which connects to other souls (souls of people we love) in such a strange way that despite physical distance and actual encouragements one gets strength to fight.

Only if we could find the connection........